Today’s consumers are more conscious than ever about the environmental impact of the products they purchase. Many have traded in their plastic water bottles for reusable ones, opted for sustainable clothing brands over cheaper fast-fashion houses, and canceled their convenient food delivery subscriptions due to excessive packaging waste.
Consumers have serious buying power, and they have started to vote with their dollars. To serve these markets—and stay ahead of the competition—brands and industry leaders can’t ignore the materials in the products that are used on a daily basis. The more consumers know, the better the global outcome will be.
Today, we’ll dive into the benefits and trade-offs of PCR and PIR, two responsibly produced packaging options that are growing in popularity.
But first, let’s define the two and outline their different processes.
PCR comes from anything that consumers recycle—from soda cans to plastic bottles to glass. Let’s follow the path of soda cans to outline the process:
See the procees unfold in this tour of a recycling plant!
As for PIR materials, they come from waste generated during the original packaging manufacturing process.
This is a more closed-loop system where manufacturing facilities collect scraps of a particular product, like tin cans, created during the manufacturing process, melt them down, and then reuses them to make the same product.
Of course, recycled packaging doesn't always guarantee environmental benefits—there are always trade-offs.
While everyone can help drive change by choosing to shop with brands that are using recycled packaging, the power really falls on industry leaders to make more PCR and PIR packaging available for brands to sell and consumers to buy. The bottom line: responsibly produced packaging can reduce energy consumption and promote environmental health.